<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mandatory DNA Sampling Constitutional. Expect Ruling to be Upheld.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/</link>
	<description>Irreverent and insightful observations on criminal law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:15:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: longharry30</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>longharry30</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>Damn, that sound&#039;s so easy if you think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that sound&#8217;s so easy if you think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaellaS</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaellaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>tks for the effort you put in here I appreciate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tks for the effort you put in here I appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flash</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Is it true? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Is it true? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopuram » Blog Archive » U.S. to expand DNA collection efforts: report</title>
		<link>http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>gopuram » Blog Archive » U.S. to expand DNA collection efforts: report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://burneylawfirm.com/blog/2009/05/29/mandatory-dna-sampling-constitutional-expect-ruling-to-be-upheld/#comment-701</guid>
		<description>[...] The Criminal Lawyer» Blog Archive » Mandatory DNA Sampling &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Criminal Lawyer» Blog Archive » Mandatory DNA Sampling &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
